Paper detail

Direct estimation of the energy gap between the ground state and excited state with quantum annealing

Quantum chemistry is one of the important applications of quantum information technology. Especially, an estimation of the energy gap between a ground state and excited state of a target Hamiltonian corresponding to a molecule is essential. In the previous approach, an energy of the ground state and that of the excited state are estimated separately, and the energy gap can be calculated from the subtraction between them. Here, we propose a direct estimation of the energy gap between the ground state and excited state of the target Hamiltonian with quantum annealing. The key idea is to combine a Ramsey type measurement with the quantum annealing. This provides an oscillating signal with a frequency of the energy gap, and a Fourier transform of the signal let us know the energy gap. Based on typical parameters of superconducting qubits, we numerically investigate the performance of our scheme when we estimate an energy gap between the ground state and first excited state of the Hamiltonian. We show robustness against non-adiabatic transitions between the ground state and first-excited state. Our results pave a new way to estimate the energy gap of the Hamiltonian for quantum chemistry.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.