Paper detail

Direct Estimation of Firing Rates from Calcium Imaging Data

Two-photon imaging of calcium indicators allows simultaneous recording of responses of hundreds of neurons over hours and even days, but provides a relatively indirect measure of their spiking activity. Existing deconvolution algorithms attempt to recover spikes from observed imaging data, which are then commonly subjected to the same analyses that are applied to electrophysiologically recorded spikes (e.g., estimation of average firing rates, or tuning curves). Here we show, however, that in the presence of noise this approach is often heavily biased. We propose an alternative analysis that aims to estimate the underlying rate directly, by integrating over the unobserved spikes instead of committing to a single estimate of the spike train. This approach can be used to estimate average firing rates or tuning curves directly from the imaging data, and is sufficiently flexible to incorporate prior knowledge about tuning structure. We show that directly estimated rates are more accurate than those obtained from averaging of spikes estimated through deconvolution, both on simulated data and on imaging data acquired in mouse visual cortex.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.