Paper detail

Dipping -versus Flaring in Z-track sources: resolving the controversy

We review the longterm confusion which has existed over the nature of flaring in the brightest class of low mass X-ray binary: the Z-track sources, specifically in the Cygnus X-2 sub-group. Intensity reductions in the lightcurve produce a branch in colour -colour diagrams similar to that of real flares in the Sco X-1 like group, and the nature of this branch was not clear. However, based on observations of Cygnus X-2 in which this dipping/flaring occurred it was proposed that the mass accretion rate in Z-track sources in general increases monotonically along the Z-track towards the Flaring Branch, a standard assumption widely held. It was also suggested that the Cygnus X-2 group have high inclination. Based on recent multi-wavelength observations of Cygnus X-2 we resolve these issues, showing by spectral analysis that the Dipping Branch consists of absorption events in the outer disk, unrelated to the occasional real flaring in the source. Thus motivation for Mdot increasing along the Z from Horizontal - Normal to Flaring Branch is removed, as is the idea that high inclination distinguishes the Cygnus X-2 group. Finally, the observations provide further evidence for the extended nature of the Accretion Disk Corona (ADC), and the correct modelling of the ADC Comptonized emission is crucial to the interpretation of low mass X-ray binary data.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.