Paper detail

Dipping Our Toes in the Water: First Models of GD-1 as a Stream

We present a model for producing tidal streams from disrupting progenitors in arbitrary potentials, utilizing the idea that the majority of stars escape from the progenitor's two Lagrange points. The method involves releasing test particles at the Lagrange points as the satellite orbits the host and dynamically evolving them in the potential of both host and progenitor. The method is sufficiently fast to allow large-dimensional parameter exploration using Monte Carlo methods. We provide the first direct modelling of 6-D stream observations -- assuming a stream rather than an orbit -- by applying our methods to GD-1. This is a kinematically cold stream spanning $60^{\circ}$ of the sky and residing in the outer Galaxy $\approx 15$ kpc distant from the centre. We assume the stream moves in a flattened logarithmic potential characterised by an asymptotic circular velocity $v_0$ and a flattening $q$. We recover values of normalisation $v_0$ = $227.2^{+15.6}_{-18.2}$ kms$^{-1}$ and flattening $q$ = $0.91^{+0.04}_{-0.1}$, if the stream is assumed to leading, and $v_0$ = $226.5^{+17.9}_{-17.0}$ kms$^{-1}$, $q$ = $0.90^{+0.05}_{-0.09}$, if it is assumed to be trailing. This can be compared to the values $v_0 = 224 \pm 13$ kms$^{-1}$ and $q= 0.87^{+0.07}_{-0.04}$ obtained by Koposov et al (2010) using the simpler technique of orbit fitting. Although there are differences between stream and orbit fitting, we conclude that orbit fitting can provide accurate results given the current quality of the data, at least for this kinematically cold stream in this logarithmic model of the Galaxy.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.