Paper detail

Dipole subtraction with random polarisations

In this talk, we discuss the speed-up of numerical calculations of jet observables by replacing the usual sum over all helicity amplitudes with an integral over a parametrisation for the parton polarisations called random polarisations. Random polarisations are a linear combination of helicity eigenstates multiplied by a phase factor depending on a so-called helicity angle. Instead of a summation over discrete helicities, random polarisations require an integration over the helicity angle. By combining this integral with the final-state phase space integral, we only have to evaluate one squared amplitude per phase space point instead of $2^n$ helicity amplitudes, where $n$ is the total number of particles in the process. While the technique itself has been known since 1998, so far there has been no way of using it with dipole subtraction, which is probably the most-used method for dealing with infrared divergences in NLO calculations. After giving detailed reasons for this statement, we propose a solution to this problem in terms of extending the existing subtraction method by a new term.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.