Paper detail

Diphotons from Tetraphotons in the Decay of a 125 GeV Higgs at the LHC

Recently the ATLAS and CMS experiments have presented data hinting at the presence of a Higgs boson at $m_h\simeq125$ GeV. The best-fit $h\rightarrowγγ$ rate averaged over the two experiments is approximately $2.1\pm0.5$ times the Standard Model prediction. We study the possibility that the excess relative to the Standard Model is due to $h\rightarrow aa$ decays, where $a$ is a light pseudoscalar that decays predominantly into $γγ$. Although this process yields $4γ$ final states, if the pseudoscalar has a mass of the order tens of MeV, the two photons from each $a$ decay can be so highly collimated that they may be identified as a single photon. Some fraction of the events then contribute to an effective $h\rightarrowγγ$ signal. We study the constraints on the parameter space where the net $h\rightarrowγγ$ rate is enhanced over the Standard Model by this mechanism and describe some simple models that give rise to the pseudoscalar-photon interaction. Further tests and prospects for searches in the near future are discussed.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.