Paper detail

Diphoton Higgs signal strength in universal extra dimensions

The signal strength of the $gg \to H \to γγ$ reaction in $pp$ collisions at the LHC is studied within the context of the SM with UED. The impact of an arbitrary number $n$ of UED on both the $gg\to H$ and $H\to γγ$ subprocesses is studied. The 1-loop contributions of Kaluza-Klein excitations to these subprocesses are proportional to discrete and continuous sums, which can diverge. By implementing dimensional regularization, it is shown that discrete regularized sums can naturally be expressed as multidimensional Epstein functions, and that divergences, if exist, emerge through the poles of these functions. It is found that continuous sums converge, but the discrete ones diverge, with the exception of the $n=1$ case, in which the 1-dimensional Epstein function converges. It is argued that divergences that arise from discrete sums for $n\geq 2$ are genuine UV divergences, since they correspond to short-distance effects in the compact manifold. Then, the amplitudes are renormalized in a modern sense by incorporating interactions of canonical dimension higher than four that allow us to generate the required counterterms, which are determined using a $\overline{\rm MS}$-like renormalization scheme. We find that the $gg\to H$ subprocess is quite sensitive to both the size and the dimension of the compact manifold, but the SM prediction for $H\to γγ$ subprocess is practically unchanged. In the $n=1$ case, it is found that the experimental constraint on the compactification scale $R^{-1}\geq 1.5$ TeV allow us to reproduce the experimental limit on the signal strength $1.01\leq μ^{(1)}_{γγ}\leq 1.2$. In the $n\geq 2$ cases, it is found that the experimental limit on $μ^{(n)}_{γγ}$ leads to stronger lower bounds for the compactification scale given by $R^{-1}\geq 1.55, 2.45, 3.57, 5.10, 7.25$ TeVs for $n=2, 4, 6, 8, 10$, respectively.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.