Diophantine properties of IETs and general systems: Quantitative proximality and connectivity

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Abstract

We present shrinking targets results for general systems with the emphasis on applications for IETs (interval exchange transformations) (J,T)(J,T), J=[0,1)J=[0,1). In particular, we prove that if an IET (J,T)(J,T) is ergodic (relative to the Lebesgue measure $\lam$), then the equality \[ \liminf_{n\to\infty}\limits n |T^n(x)-y|=0 \tag{A1} \] holds for $\lam\ttimes\lam$-a. a. (x,y)∈J2(x,y)\in J^2. The ergodicity assumption is essential: the result does not extend to all minimal IETs. The factor nn in (A1) is optimal (e. g., it cannot be replaced by nln⁡(ln⁡(ln⁡n))n \ln(\ln(\ln n)). On the other hand, for Lebesgue almost all 3-IETs (J,T)(J,T) we prove that for all $\eps>0$ \[ \liminf_{n\to\infty}\limits n^\eps |T^n(x)-T^n(y)|= \infty,\quad \text{for Lebesgue a. a.} (x,y)\in J^2. \tag{A2} \] This should be contrasted with the equality lim inf⁡n→∞∣Tn(x)−Tn(y)∣=0, \liminf_{n\to\infty}\limits |T^n(x)-T^n(y)|=0, for a. a. (x,y)∈J2(x,y)\in J^2, which holds since (J2,T×T)(J^2, T\times T) is ergodic (because generic 3-IETs (J,T)(J,T) are weakly mixing). We also prove that no 3-IET is strongly topologically mixing.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.