Paper detail

Diophantine equations and the monodromy groups

We study Diophantine equations of type f(x)=g(y), where both f and g have at least two distinct critical points and equal critical values at at most two distinct critical points. Some classical families of polynomials (f_n)_n are such that f_n satisfies these assumptions for all n. Our results cover and generalize several results in the literature on the finiteness of integral solutions to such equations. In doing so, we analyse the properties of the monodromy groups of such polynomials. We show that if f has coefficients in a field K, at least two distinct critical points and all distinct critical values, and char(K) is not a divisor of the degree of f, then the monodromy group of f is a doubly transitive permutation group. This is the same as saying that (f(x)-f(y))/(x-y) is irreducible over K. In particular, f cannot be represented as a composition of lower degree polynomials. We further show that if f has at least two distinct critical points and equal critical values at at most two of them, and if f(x)=g(h(x)), where g and h have coefficients in K and g is of degree at least 2, then either the degree of h is less or equal than 2, or f is of special type. In the latter case, in particular, f has no three simple critical points, nor five distinct critical points.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.