Paper detail

Diophantine equations: a systematic approach

This paper initiates a novel research direction in the theory of Diophantine equations: define an appropriate version of the equation's size, order all polynomial Diophantine equations starting from the smallest ones, and then solve the equations in that order. By combining a new computer-aided procedure with human reasoning, we solved the Hilbert's tenth problem for all polynomial Diophantine equations of size less than $31$, where the size is defined in (Zidane, 2018). In addition, we solved this problem for all equations of size equal to $31$, with a single exception. Further, we solved the Hilbert's tenth problem for all two-variable Diophantine equations of size less than $32$, all symmetric equations of size less than $39$, all three-monomial equations of size less than $45$, and, in each category, identified the explicit smallest equations for which the problem remains open. As a result, we derived a list of equations that are very simple to write down but which are apparently difficult to solve. As we know from the example of Fermat's Last Theorem, such equations have a potential to stimulate the development of new methods in number theory.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.