Paper detail

Dimensions of irreducible modules over W-algebras and Goldie ranks

The main goal of this paper is to compute two related numerical invariants of a primitive ideal in the universal enveloping algebra of a semisimple Lie algebra. The first one, very classical, is the Goldie rank of an ideal. The second one is the dimension of an irreducible module corresponding to this ideal over an appropriate finite W-algebra. We concentrate on the integral central character case. We prove, modulo a conjecture, that in this case the two are equal. Also, modulo the same conjecture, we compute certain scale factors introduced by Joseph. Our conjecture asserts that there is a one-dimensional module over the W-algebra with certain additional properties. The conjecture is proved for the classical types. This completes a program of computing Goldie ranks proposed by Joseph in the 80's. We also provide an essentially Kazhdan-Lusztig type formula for computing the characters of the irreducibles in the Brundan-Goodwin-Kleshchev category O for a W-algebra again under the assumption that the central character is integral. The formula is based on a certain functor (a generalized Soegel functor) from an appropriate parabolic category O to the W-algebra category O. We prove a number of properties of this functor including the quotient property and the double centralizer property. We develop several topics related to our generalized Soergel functor. For example, we discuss its analog for the category of Harish-Chandra bimodules. We also discuss generalizations to the case of categories O over Dixmier algebras. The most interesting example of this situation comes from the theory of quantum groups: we prove that an algebra that is basically Luszitg's form of a quantum group at a root of unity is a Dixmier algebra. For this we check that the quantum Frobenius epimorphism splits.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.