Paper detail

Dimensions in non-Archimedean geometries

Let $K$ be an algebraically closed non-Archimedean field. Leonard Lipshitz has introduced a manageable notion of subanalytic sets of the unit polydisc. This class contains the class of affinoid sets and is stable under projection. We associate to a subanalytic set its counterpart in the Berkovich polydisc. This allows us to give a new insight to the dimension of subanalytic sets using the degrees of the completed residual fields. With these methods we obtain new results, such as the invariance of the dimension under subanalytic bijection in any characteristic. Then we study more generally subsets $S$ of $K^m\times Γ^n$ and of $K^m\times Γ^n \times k^p$ where $Γ$ is the value group and $k$ the residue field. We allow $S$ to be either definable in ACVF, or definable in the analytic language of L. Lipshitz. We define a dimension for such sets $S$. In the case when $S \subset K^n$ (resp. $S\subset Γ^n$, $S\subset k^n$), it coincides with the above dimension (resp. the o-minimal dimension, the Zariski dimension). We prove that this dimension is invariant under definable bijection and decreases under projection. This allows us to generalize previous results on tropicalization of Berkovich spaces and to place them in a general framework.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.