Paper detail

Dimensionally Exponential Lower Bounds on the $L^p$ Norms of the Spherical Maximal Operator for Cartesian Powers of Finite Trees and Related Graphs

Let $T$ be a finite tree graph, $T^N$ be the Cartesian power graph of $T$, and $d^N$ be the graph distance metric on $T^N$. Also let \[ \mathbb S_r^N(x) := \{v \in T^N: d^N(x,v) = r\} \] be the sphere of radius $r$ centered at $x$ and $M$ be the spherical maximal averaging operator on $T^N$ given by \[ Mf(x) := \sup_{\substack{r \geq 0 \\ \mathbb S_r^N(x) \neq \emptyset}} \frac{1}{|\mathbb S_r^N(x)|} |\sum_{\mathbb S_r^N(x)} f(y)|. \] We will show that for any fixed $1 \leq p \leq \infty$, the $L^p$ operator norm of $M$, i.e. \[ \|M\|_p := \sup_{\|f\|_p = 1} \|Mf\|_p, \] grows exponentially in the dimension $N$. In particular, if $r$ is the probability that a random vertex of $T$ is a leaf, then $\|M\|_p \geq r^{-N/p}$, although this is not a sharp bound. This exponential growth phenomenon extends to a class of graphs strictly larger than trees, which we will call \emph{global antipode graphs}. This growth result stands in contrast to the work of Greenblatt, Harrow, Kolla, Krause, and Schulman that proved that the spherical maximal $L^p$ bounds (for $p > 1$) are dimension-independent for finite cliques.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.