Paper detail

Dijet production, collision centrality and backgrounds in high-energy p-p collisions

Two aspects of high-energy \pp collisions share common phenomenological elements: (a) A correlation between jet production and \pp centrality is suggested by the transverse partonic structure of hadrons inferred from deep-inelastic scattering data. (b) The {\em underlying event} (UE) is defined as the final-state particles complementary to a triggered high-energy dijet. An observable common to both topics is variation of so-called {\em transverse multiplicity} $N_\perp$ with a $p_{t,trig}$ dijet trigger. We test assumptions associated with \pp collision centrality and the UE. We determine the nature of the UE and explore the relation between jet production and \pp centrality. We use the {\em two-component model} (TCM) of spectra and correlations derived from 200 GeV \pp collisions to construct a simulated particle distribution on $(p_t,n_{ch})$ to predict the $N_\perp$ response to $p_{t,trig}$. The $p_t$ spectrum TCM combined in this analysis with measured minimum-bias \pp angular correlations suggests that the UE includes a substantial contribution from the triggered dijet in addition to the contribution from projectile fragmentation (beam-beam remnants). The jet contribution to $N_\perp$ may represent a universal large-angle base common to all dijets that extends across $2π$ azimuth. The analysis further suggests that \pp centrality is not controlled significantly by $p_{t,trig}$ but may be correlated to some extent with an imposed $n_{ch}$ condition, depending on the role of fluctuations. Future correlation studies may better determine the role of \pp centrality. These results may have implications for ongoing RHIC analysis and LHC searches for physics beyond the standard model.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.