Paper detail

Dihedral and cyclic symmetric maps on surfaces

If the face\mbox{-}cycles at all the vertices in a map are of the same type, then the map is said to be a semi-equivelar map. Automorphism (symmetry) of a map can be thought of as a permutation of the vertices which preserves the vertex\mbox{-}edge\mbox{-}face incidences in the embedding. The set of all symmetries forms the symmetry group. In this article, we discuss the maps' symmetric groups on higher genus surfaces. In particular, we show that there are at least $39$ types of the semi-equivelar maps on the surface with Euler char. $-2m, m \ge 2$ and the symmetry groups of the maps are isomorphic to the dihedral group or cyclic group. Further, we prove that these $39$ types of semi-equivelar maps are the only types on the surface with Euler char. $-2$. Moreover, we know the complete list of semi-equivelar maps (up to isomorphism) for a few types. We extend this list to one more type and can classify others similarly. We skip this part in this article.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.