Paper detail

Diffusion time dependence, power-law scaling, and exchange in gray matter

Diffusion MRI (dMRI) provides contrast that reflect diffusing spins' interactions with microstructural features of biological systems, but its specificity remains limited due to the ambiguity of its relation to the underlying microstructure. To improve specificity, biophysical models of white matter (WM) typically express dMRI signals according to the Standard Model (SM) and have more recently in gray matter (GM) attempted to incorporate cell soma (the SANDI model). The validity of the assumptions underlying these models, however, remains largely undetermined, especially in GM. Observing the models' unique, functional properties, such as the $b^{-1/2}$ power-law associated with 1d diffusion, has emerged as a fruitful strategy for experimental validation. The absence of this signature in GM has been explained by neurite water exchange, non-linear morphology, and/or obscuring soma signal contributions. Here, we present simulations in realistic neurons demonstrating that curvature and branching does not destroy the stick power-law in impermeable neurites, but that their signal is drowned by the soma under typical experimental conditions: Nevertheless, we identify an attainable experimental regime in which the neurite signal dominates. Furthermore, we find that exchange-driven time dependence produces a behavior opposite to that expected from restricted diffusion, thereby providing a functional signature disambiguating the two effects. We present data from dMRI experiments in ex vivo rat brain at ultrahigh field and observe a time dependence consistent with substantial exchange and a GM stick power-law. The first finding suggests significant water exchange while the second suggests a small sub-population of impermeable neurites. To quantify our observations, we harness the Kärger exchange model and incorporate the corresponding signal time dependence in SM and SANDI.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.