Paper detail

Diffusion of Lithium Ions in Lithium-Argyrodite Solid-State Electrolytes from Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Molecular Dynamics Simulations

The use of solid-state electrolytes to provide safer, next-generation rechargeable batteries is becoming more feasible as new materials with greater stability and higher ionic diffusion coefficients are designed. However, accurate determination of diffusion coefficients in solids is problematic and reliable calculations are highly sought-after. In this paper we compare diffusion coefficients calculated using nonequilibrium and equilibrium ab initio molecular dynamics simulations for highly diffusive solid-state electrolytes for the first time, to demonstrate the accuracy that can be obtained. Moreover, we show that ab initio nonequilibrium molecular dynamics can be used to determine diffusion coefficients when the diffusion is too slow for it to be feasible to obtain them using ab initio equilibrium simulations. Thereby, using ab initio nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations we are able to obtain accurate estimates of the diffusion coefficients of Li ions in Li$_6$PS$_5$Cl and Li$_5$PS$_4$Cl$_2$, two promising electrolytes for all-solid-state batteries. Furthermore, these calculations show that the diffusion coefficient of lithium ions in Li$_5$PS$_4$Cl$_2$ is higher than many other potential all-solid-state electrolytes, making it promising for future technologies. The reasons for variation in conductivities determined using computational and experimental methods are also discussed. It is demonstrated that small degrees of disorder and vacancies can result in orders of magnitude differences in diffusivities of Li ions in Li$_6$PS$_5$Cl, and these factors are likely to contribute to inconsistencies observed in experimentally reported values. Notably, the introduction of Li-vacancies and disorder can enhance the ionic conductivity of Li$_6$PS$_5$Cl.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.