Paper detail

Diffusion of individual birds in starling flocks

Flocking is a paradigmatic example of collective animal behaviour, where decentralized interaction rules give rise to a globally ordered state. In the emergence of order out of self-organization we find similarities between biological systems, as bird flocks, and some physical systems, as ferromagnets. In both cases, the tendency of individuals to align to their neighbours gives rise to a polarized state. There is, however, one crucial difference: the interaction network within an animal group is not necessarily fixed in time, as each individual moves and may change its neighbours. Therefore, the dynamical interaction mechanism in biological and physical system can be quite different, not only due to the gross disparity in the complexity of the individual entities, but also because of the potential role of inter-individual motion. To assess the relevance of this mechanism it is necessary to gain quantitative experimental information about how much individuals move with respect to each other within the group. Here, by using data from field observations on starlings, we study the diffusion properties of individual birds within a flock and investigate the effect of diffusion on the dynamics of the interaction network. We find that birds diffuse faster than Brownian particles (superdiffusion) and in a strongly anisotropic way. We also find that neighbours change in time exclusively as a consequence of diffusion, so that no specific mechanism to keep one's neighbours seems to be enforced. Finally, we study the diffusion properties of birds at the border of the flock. We find that these individuals remain on the border significantly longer than what would be expected on the basis of a purely diffusional model, suggesting that there is a sort barrier a bird must cross to make the transition from border to interior of the flock.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.