Paper detail

Diffusion Limit For The Random Walk Metropolis Algorithm Out Of stationarity

The Random Walk Metropolis (RWM) algorithm is a Metropolis- Hastings MCMC algorithm designed to sample from a given target distribution πwith Lebesgue density on R^N. RWM constructs a Markov chain by randomly proposing a new position (the "proposal move"), which is then accepted or rejected according to a rule which makes the chain reversible with respect to π. When the dimension N is large a key question is to determine the optimal scaling with N of the proposal variance: if the proposal variance is too large, the algorithm will reject the proposed moves too often; if it is too small, the algorithm will explore the state space too slowly. Determining the optimal scaling of the proposal variance gives a measure of the cost of the algorithm as well. One approach to tackle this issue, which we adopt here, is to derive diffusion limits for the algorithm. Such an approach has been proposed in the seminal papers [RGG97, RR98]; in particular in [RGG97] the authors derive a diffusion limit for the RWM algorithm under the two following assumptions: i) the algorithm is started in stationarity; ii) the target measure $π$ is in product form. The present paper considers the situation of practical interest in which both assumptions i) and ii) are removed. That is a) we study the case (which occurs in practice) in which the algorithm is started out of stationarity and b) we consider target measures which are in non-product form. The target measures that we consider arise in Bayesian nonparametric statistics and in the study of conditioned diffusions. We prove that, out of stationarity, the optimal scaling for the proposal variance is O(N), as it is in stationarity. Notice that the optimal scaling in and out of stationatity need not be the same in general, and indeed they differ e.g. in the case of the MALA algorithm [KOS16].

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.