Paper detail

Diffuse-interface approach to competition between viscous flow and diffusion in pinch-off dynamics

The pinch-off dynamics of a liquid thread has been studied through numerical simulations and theoretical analysis. Occurring at small length scales, the pinch-off dynamics admits similarity solutions that can be classified into the Stokes regime and the diffusion-dominated regime, with the latter being recently experimentally observed in aqueous two-phase systems [Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 134501 (2019)]. Derived by applying Onsager's variational principle, the Cahn-Hilliard-Navier-Stokes model is employed as a minimal model capable of describing the interfacial motion driven by not only advection but also diffusion. By analyzing the free energy dissipation mechanisms in the model, a characteristic length scale is introduced to measure the competition between diffusion and viscous flow in interfacial motion. This length scale is typically of nanometer scale for systems far from the critical point, but can approach micrometer scale for aqueous two-phase systems close to the critical point. The Cahn-Hilliard-Navier-Stokes model is solved by using an accurate and efficient spectral method in a cylindrical domain with axisymmetry. Ample numerical examples are presented to show the pinch-off processes in the Stokes regime and the diffusion-dominated regime respectively. In particular, the crossover between these two regimes is investigated numerically and analytically to reveal how the scaling behaviors of similarity solutions are to be qualitatively changed as the characteristic length scale is inevitably accessed by the pinching neck of the interface. Discussions are also provided for numerical examples that are performed for the breakup of long liquid filaments and show qualitatively different phenomena in different scaling regimes.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.