Paper detail

Difficulties with Recovering The Masses of Supermassive Black Holes from Stellar Kinematical Data

We investigate the ability of three-integral, axisymmetric, orbit-based modeling algorithms to recover the parameters defining the gravitational potential (M/L ratio and black hole mass Mh) in spheroidal stellar systems using stellar kinematical data. We show that the potential estimation problem is generically under-determined when applied to long-slit kinematical data of the kind used in most black hole mass determinations to date. A range of parameters (M/L, Mh) can provide equally good fits to the data, making it impossible to assign best-fit values. We illustrate the indeterminacy using a variety of data sets derived from realistic models as well as published observations of the galaxy M32. In the case of M32, our reanalysis demonstrates that data published prior to 2000 are equally consistent with Mh in the range 1.5x10^6-5x10^6 solar masses, with no preferred value in that range. While the HST/STIS data for this galaxy may overcome the degeneracy in Mh, HST data for most galaxies do not resolve the black hole's sphere of influence and in these galaxies the degree of degeneracy allowed by the data may be substantial. We investigate the effect on the degeneracy of enforcing smoothness (regularization) constraints. However we find no indication that the true potential can be recovered simply by enforcing smoothness. For a given smoothing level, all solutions in the minimum-chisquare valley exhibit similar levels of noise. These experiments affirm that the indeterminacy is real and not an artifact associated with non-smooth solutions. (Abridged)

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.