Paper detail

Differentiating between sharp and smoother phase transitions in neutron stars

The internal composition of neutron stars is still an open issue in astrophysics. Their innermost regions are impervious to light propagation and gravitational waves mostly carry global aspects of stars, meaning that only indirect inferences of their interiors could be obtained. Here we assume a hypothetical future scenario in which an equation of state softening due to a phase transition is identified and estimate the observational accuracy to differentiate a sharp phase transition from a smoother one (associated with a mixed phase/state due to the unknown value of the surface tension of dense matter) in a region of a hybrid star by means of some electromagnetic and gravitational wave observables. We show that different transition constructions lead to similar sequences of stellar configurations due to their shared thermodynamic properties. In the most optimistic case - a strong quark-hadron density jump phase transition - radius observations require fractional uncertainties smaller than $1\%-2\%$ to differentiate mixed states from sharp phase transitions. For tidal deformabilities, relative uncertainties should be smaller than $5\%-10\%$. However, for masses around the onset of stable quark cores, relative tidal deformability differences associated with strong sharp phase transitions and mixed states could be much larger (up to around $20\%-30\%$). All the above suggests that 2.5- and 3rd generation gravitational wave detectors and near-term electromagnetic missions may be able to start assessing some particular aspects of phase transitions in neutron stars. In addition, it points to some limitations on the equation of state recovery using typical neutron star observables and the impact of systematic uncertainties on modellings of the equation of state of hybrid stars. Finally, we briefly discuss other observables that may also be relevant for the probe of mixed states in stars.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.