Paper detail

Differentially Private Distributed Optimal Power Flow

Distributed algorithms enable private Optimal Power Flow (OPF) computations by avoiding the need in sharing sensitive information localized in algorithms sub-problems. However, adversaries can still infer this information from the coordination signals exchanged across iterations. This paper seeks formal privacy guarantees for distributed OPF computations and provides differentially private algorithms for OPF computations based on the consensus Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM). The proposed algorithms attain differential privacy by introducing static and dynamic random perturbations of OPF sub-problem solutions at each iteration. These perturbations are Laplacian and designed to prevent the inference of sensitive information, as well as to provide theoretical privacy guarantees for ADMM sub-problems. Using a standard IEEE 118-node test case, the paper explores the fundamental trade-offs among privacy, algorithmic convergence, and optimality losses.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.