Paper detail

Differential Proper-Motion Study of the Circumstellar Dust Shell of the Enigmatic Object, HD 179821

HD179821 is an enigmatic evolved star that possesses characteristics of both a post-asymptotic giant branch star and a yellow hyper-giant, and there has been no evidence that unambiguously defines its nature. These two hypotheses are products of an indeterminate distance, presumed to be 1 kpc or 6 kpc. We have obtained the two-epoch Hubble Space Telescope WFPC2 data of its circumstellar shell, which shows multiple concentric arcs extending out to about 8 arcsec. We have performed differential proper-motion measurements on distinct structures within the circumstellar shell of this mysterious star in hopes of determining the distance to the object, and thereby distinguishing the nature of this enigmatic stellar source. Upon investigation, rather than azimuthal radially symmetric expansion, we discovered a bulk motion of the circumstellar shell of (2.41+-0.43, 2.97+-0.32) mas/yr. This corresponded to a translational ISM flow of (1.28+-0.95, 7.27+-0.75) mas/yr local to the star. This finding implies that the distance to HD 179821 should be rather small in order for its circumstellar shell to preserve its highly intact spherical structure in the presence of the distorting ISM flow, therefore favoring the proposition that HD 179821 is a post-AGB object.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.