Paper detail

Differential impact of acute fine particulate matter exposure on risk of stroke by stroke subtype, age, sex, and race: a case-crossover study

Objective: Association between acute ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5, aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 and cardiovascular events are well documented. However, it remains unclear whether acute exposure to PM2.5 acts as a trigger for hemorrhagic (intracerebral or subarachnoid hemorrhage) or non-hemorrhagic (infarct or transient ischemic attack) stroke onset. We, therefore, examined the association between ambient PM2.5 and stroke onset, and whether this relationship differs by stroke subtype, age, sex, and race. Methods: We used a time-stratified case-crossover design to examine the association between exposure to PM2.5 and stroke onset for the calendar year 2010. Data were collected from the Greater Cincinnati Northern Kentucky Stroke Study. We included patients 20 years and older, initially ascertained through hospital ICD-9 discharge codes. Daily ambient concentrations of PM2.5 were estimated from the patient's residential addresses using a spatiotemporal model. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that short-term PM2.5 exposure, particularly at three days before the event, is associated with stroke onset but varies according to stroke subtype, age, sex, and race.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access17 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.