Paper detail

Differentiability at the edge of the percolation cone and related results in first-passage percolation

We study first-passage percolation in two dimensions, using measures mu on passage times with b:=inf supp(mu) >0 and mu({b})=p \geq p_c, the threshold for oriented percolation. We first show that for each such mu, the boundary of the limit shape for mu is differentiable at the endpoints of flat edges in the so-called percolation cone. We then conclude that the limit shape must be non-polygonal for all of these measures. Furthermore, the associated Richardson-type growth model admits infinite coexistence and if mu is not purely atomic the graph of infection has infinitely many ends. We go on to show that lower bounds for fluctuations of the passage time given by Newman-Piza extend to these measures. We establish a lower bound for the variance of the passage time to distance n of order log n in any direction outside the percolation cone under a condition of finite exponential moments for mu. This result confirms a prediction of Newman-Piza and Zhang. Under the assumption of finite radius of curvature for the limit shape in these directions, we obtain a power-law lower bound for the variance and an inequality between the exponents chi and xi.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.