Paper detail

Different single photon response of wide and narrow superconducting MoSi strips

The photon count rate of superconducting single photon detectors made of MoSi films shaped as a $2\,μ$m-wide strip and a 115 nm-wide meander stripline is studied experimentally as a function of the dc biasing current at different values of the perpendicular magnetic field. For the wide strip a crossover current $I_\textrm{cross}$ is observed, below which the photon count rate increases with increasing magnetic field and above which it decreases. This behavior contrasts with the narrow MoSi meander for which no crossover current is observed, thus suggesting different photon detection mechanisms in the wide and narrow strips. Namely, we argue that in the wide strip the absorbed photon destroys superconductivity locally via the vortex-antivortex mechanism for the emergence of resistance while in the narrow meander superconductivity is destroyed across the whole stripline, forming a hot belt. Accordingly, the different photon detection mechanisms associated with vortices and the hot belt stipulate the qualitative difference in the dependence of the photon count rate on the magnetic field.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.