Paper detail

Differences in the fractions of Be stars in galaxies

The number ratios Be/(B+Be) of Be to B-type stars in young, well studied clusters of the Galaxy, the LMC and SMC are examined. In order to disentangle age and metallicity effects we choose clusters in the same age interval and for which reliable photometric and spectroscopic data are available. Number counts are made for various magnitude intervals, and the results are found to be stable with respect to this choice. In the magnitude interval Mv = -5 to -1.4 (i.e. O9 to B3) we obtained a ratio Be/(B+Be) = 0.11, 0.19, 0.23, 0.39 for 21 clusters located in the interior of the Galaxy, the exterior of the Galaxy, the LMC and the SMC, respectively. Various hypotheses for these differences are examined. An interesting possibility is that the average rotation is faster at low metallicities as a result of star formation processes. The much higher relative N-enrichment found by Venn et al. (1998) in A-type supergiants of the SMC, compared to galactic supergiants, also strongly supports the presence of more rotational mixing at low metallicities. We discuss whether high rotational mixing may be the source of primary nitrogen in the early chemical evolution of galaxies.

preprint1999arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.