Paper detail

Differences and similarities of stellar populations in LAEs and LBGs at $z\sim$ 3.4 - 6.8

The differences between the inherent stellar populations (SPs) of LAEs and LBGs are a key factor in understanding early galaxy formation and evolution. We have run a set of SP burst-like models for a sample of 1,558 sources at $3.4<z<6.8$ from the Survey for High-$z$ Absorption Red and Dead Sources (SHARDS) over the GOODS-N field. This work focuses on the differences between the three different observational subfamilies of our sample: LAE-LBGs, no-Ly$α$ LBGs and pure LAEs. Single and double SP synthetic spectra were used to model the SEDs, adopting a Bayesian information criterion to analyse under which situations a second SP is required. We find that the sources are well modelled using a single SP in $\sim79\%$ of the cases. The best models suggest that pure LAEs are typically young low mass galaxies ($t\sim26^{+41}_{-25}$ Myr; $M_{\mathrm{star}}\sim5.6^{+12.0}_{-5.5}\times10^{8}\ M_{\odot}$), undergoing one of their first bursts of star formation. On the other hand, no-Ly$α$ LBGs require older SPs ($t\sim71\pm12$ Myr), and they are substantially more massive ($M_{\mathrm{star}}\sim3.5\pm1.1\times10^{9}\ M_{\odot}$). LAE-LBGs appear as the subgroup that more frequently needs the addition of a second SP, representing an old and massive galaxy caught in a strong recent star-forming episode. The relative number of sources found from each subfamily at each $z$ supports an evolutionary scenario from pure LAEs and single SP LAE-LBGs to more massive LBGs. Stellar Mass Functions are also derived, finding an increase of $M^{*}$ with cosmic time and a possible steepening of the low mass slope from $z\sim6$ to $z\sim5$ with no significant change to $z\sim4$. Additionally, we have derived the SFR-$M_{\mathrm{star}}$ relation, finding a $\mathrm{SFR}\propto M_{\mathrm{star}}^β$ behaviour with negligible evolution from $z\sim4$ to $z\sim6$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.