Paper detail

Dielectric Measurement of Powdery Materials using a Coaxial Transmission Line

The following study investigates the use of a coaxial transmission line for determining the properties of powdery dielectric materials (1-10GHz). Four powdery materials with dielectric constants ranging from 3.5 to 70 (SiO$_2$, Al$_2$O$_3$, CeO$_2$, and TiO$_2$) were experimentally investigated at varying volume loading fractions. Powder particles were mixed with a paraffin matrix and properties of the powder were analyzed using ten mixing equations to verify their accuracy. These powder-paraffin composites were also modeled at varying volume loadings for comparison with experimental data to gain a better understanding of the interactions between the different phases. The optimal volume loading fraction was determined to be 10% for all powders tested. A metric for selecting the most well-suited mixing equation was proposed that involved taking the ratio of the particle dielectric to that of the matrix. This study ultimately provides guidance for experimentally measuring the dielectric properties of unknown powdery materials that have application for new devices that utilized powder-based dielectric materials.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.