Paper detail

Dictionary Matching with One Gap

The dictionary matching with gaps problem is to preprocess a dictionary $D$ of $d$ gapped patterns $P_1,\ldots,P_d$ over alphabet $Σ$, where each gapped pattern $P_i$ is a sequence of subpatterns separated by bounded sequences of don't cares. Then, given a query text $T$ of length $n$ over alphabet $Σ$, the goal is to output all locations in $T$ in which a pattern $P_i\in D$, $1\leq i\leq d$, ends. There is a renewed current interest in the gapped matching problem stemming from cyber security. In this paper we solve the problem where all patterns in the dictionary have one gap with at least $α$ and at most $β$ don't cares, where $α$ and $β$ are given parameters. Specifically, we show that the dictionary matching with a single gap problem can be solved in either $O(d\log d + |D|)$ time and $O(d\log^{\varepsilon} d + |D|)$ space, and query time $O(n(β-α)\log\log d \log ^2 \min \{ d, \log |D| \} + occ)$, where $occ$ is the number of patterns found, or preprocessing time and space: $O(d^2 + |D|)$, and query time $O(n(β-α) + occ)$, where $occ$ is the number of patterns found. As far as we know, this is the best solution for this setting of the problem, where many overlaps may exist in the dictionary.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.