Paper detail

Diamagnetic correction to the $\bm{^9}$Be$\bm{^+}$ ground-state hyperfine constant

We report an experimental determination of the diamagnetic correction to the $^9$Be$^+$ ground state hyperfine constant $A$. We measured $A$ = $-625\,008\,837.371(11)$ Hz at a magnetic field $B$ of 4.4609 T. Comparison with previous results, obtained at lower values of $B$ (0.68 T and 0.82 T), yields the diamagnetic shift coefficient $k$ = $2.63(18) \times 10^{-11}$ T$^{-2}$, where $A(B)=A_0\times (1+k B^2)$. The zero-field hyperfine constant $A_0$ is determined to be $-625\,008\,837.044(12)$ Hz. The $g$-factor ratio ${g_I}^\prime/g_J$ is determined to be $2.134\,779\,852\,7(10) \times 10^{-4}$, which is equal to the value measured at lower $B$ to within experimental error. Upper limits are placed on some other corrections to the Breit-Rabi formula. The measured value of $k$ agrees with theoretical estimates.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.