Paper detail

Diagnostics of electron beam properties from the simultaneous hard X-ray and microwave emission in the 10 March 2001 flare

Simultaneous simulation of HXR and MW emission with the same populations of electrons is still a great challenge for interpretation of observations in real events. In this paper we apply the FP kinetic model of precipitation of electron beam with energy range from 12 keV to 1.2 MeV to the interpretation of X-ray and microwave emissions observed in the flare of 10 March 2001. Methods. The theoretical HXR and MW emissions were calculated by using the distribution functions of electron beams found by solving time-dependent Fokker-Planck approach in a converging magnetic field (Zharkova at al., 2010; Kuznetsov and Zharkova, 2010) for anisotropic scattering of beam electrons on the ambient particles in Coloumb collisions and Ohmic losses. The simultaneous observed HXR photon spectra and frequency distribution of MW emission and polarization were fit by those simulated from FP models which include the effects of electric field induced by beam electrons and precipitation into a converging magnetic loop. Magnetic field strengths in the footpoints on the photosphere were updated with newly calibrated SOHO/MDI data. The observed HXR energy spectrum above 10 keV is shown to be a double power law which was fit precisely by the photon HXR spectrum simulated for the model including the self-induced electric field but without magnetic convergence. The MW emission simulated for different models of electron precipitation revealed a better fit to the observed distribution at higher frequencies for the models combining collisions and electric field effects with a moderate magnetic field convergence of 2. The MW simulations were able to reproduce closely the main features of the MW emission observed at higher frequencies.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.