Paper detail

Diagnosing Circumstellar Debris Disks

(Abridged) A numerical model of a circumstellar debris disk is developed and applied to observations of the circumstellar dust orbiting beta Pictoris. The model accounts for the rates at which dust is produced by collisions among unseen planetesimals, and the rate at which dust grains are destroyed due to collisions. The model also accounts for the effects of radiation pressure, which is the dominant perturbation on the disk's smaller but abundant dust grains. Solving the resulting system of rate equations then provides the dust abundances versus grain size and over time. Those solutions also provide the dust grains' collisional lifetime versus grain size, and the debris disk's optical depth and surface brightness versus distance from the star. Comparison to observations then yields estimates of the unseen planetesimal disk's radius, and the rate at which the disk sheds mass due to planetesimal grinding. The model is then applied to optical observations of the edge-on dust disk orbiting beta Pictoris, and good agreement is achieved when the unseen planetesimal disk is broad, with 75<r<150 AU. If it is assumed that the dust grains are bright like Saturn's icy rings, then the cross section of dust in the disk is A_d~2x10^20 km^2 and its mass is M_d~11 lunar masses. In this case the planetesimal disk's dust production rate is quite heavy, dM_d/dt~9 earth-masses per Myr, implying that there is or was a substantial amount of planetesimal mass there, at least 110 earth-masses. But if the dust grains are darker than assumed, then the planetesimal disk's mass-loss rate and its total mass are heavier. In fact, the apparent dearth of any major planets in this region, plus the planetesimal disk's heavy mass-loss rate, suggests that the 75<r<150 AU zone at beta Pic might be a region of planetesimal destruction, rather than a site of ongoing planet formation.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.

Diagnosing Circumstellar Debris Disks | BZPEER | BZPEER