Paper detail

DI Her as a test of internal stellar structure and General Relativity: New apsidal motion rate and evolutionary models

For the past three decades, and until recently, there has been a serious discrepancy between the observed and theoretical values of the apsidal motion rate dw/dt of the eccentric eclipsing binary DI Her, which has even been interpreted occasionally as a possible failure of General Relativity (GR). Recent observations of the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect have shown convincingly that the reason for the anomaly is that the rotational axes of the stars and the orbital axis are misaligned, which changes the predicted rate of precession significantly. Although as a result of those measurements the disagreement is now drastically smaller, it remains formally at the level of 50%, possibly due to errors in the measured apsidal motion rate, outdated stellar models, or inaccuracies in the stellar parameters. Here we address each of these issues in order to improve the agreement further. New times of minimum have been collected in order to redetermine the apsidal motion rate. We have computed new stellar evolution models with updated physical inputs, and derived improved apsidal motion constants for the components. We have performed Monte Carlo simulations to infer the theoretical distribution of dw/dt, including the contributions from GR as well as tidal and rotational distortions. All observational errors have been accounted for. Our simulations yield a retrograde apsidal motion rate due to the rotationally-induced oblateness of -0.00056 deg/cycle (mode of the distribution), a GR contribution of +0.00068 deg/cycle, and a tidal contribution of +0.00034 deg/cycle, leading to a total predicted rate of +0.00046 deg/cycle. This is in excellent agreement with the newly measured value of +0.00042 deg/cycle. The formal difference is now reduced to 10%, a small fraction of the observational uncertainties. (abridged)

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.