Paper detail

DGSAC: Density Guided Sampling and Consensus

Robust multiple model fitting plays a crucial role in many computer vision applications. Unlike single model fitting problems, the multi-model fitting has additional challenges. The unknown number of models and the inlier noise scale are the two most important of them, which are in general provided by the user using ground-truth or some other auxiliary information. Mode seeking/ clustering-based approaches crucially depend on the quality of model hypotheses generated. While preference analysis based guided sampling approaches have shown remarkable performance, they operate in a time budget framework, and the user provides the time as a reasonable guess. In this paper, we deviate from the mode seeking and time budget framework. We propose a concept called Kernel Residual Density (KRD) and apply it to various components of a multiple-model fitting pipeline. The Kernel Residual Density act as a key differentiator between inliers and outliers. We use KRD to guide and automatically stop the sampling process. The sampling process stops after generating a set of hypotheses that can explain all the data points. An explanation score is maintained for each data point, which is updated on-the-fly. We propose two model selection algorithms, an optimal quadratic program based, and a greedy. Unlike mode seeking approaches, our model selection algorithms seek to find one representative hypothesis for each genuine structure present in the data. We evaluate our method (dubbed as DGSAC) on a wide variety of tasks like planar segmentation, motion segmentation, vanishing point estimation, plane fitting to 3D point cloud, line, and circle fitting, which shows the effectiveness of our method and its unified nature.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.