DFT-GGA errors in NO chemisorption energies on (111) transition metal surfaces: Possible origins and correction schemes

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Abstract

Here we investigate whether well-known DFT-GGA errors in predicting the chemisorption energy (EchemE_{\rm chem}) of CO on transition metal surfaces manifest in analogous NO chemisorption systems. To verify the occurrence of DFT-GGA overestimation of the back-donation mechanism in NO Chemisorption, we use electronic structure analysis to show that the partially filled molecular NO 2π∗π^{*} orbital rehybridizes with the transition metal dd-band to form new bonding and anti-bonding states. We relate the back-donation charge transfer associated with chemisorption to the promotion of an electron from the 5σσ orbital to the 2π∗π^{*} orbital in the gas-phase NO G2Σ−←X2Π^{2}Σ^{-}\leftarrow \rm{X}^{2}Π excitation. We establish linear relationships between EchemE_{\rm chem} and ΔEG←XΔE_{\rm G\leftarrow X} and go on to formulate an EchemE_{\rm chem} correction scheme in the style of Mason {\it et al.}, {[Physical Review B {\bf 69}, 161401(R)]}. We apply the NO EchemE_{\rm chem} correction method to the (111) surfaces of Pt, Pd, Rh, and Ir, with NO chemisorption modeled at a coverage of 0.25 ML. We note that both the slope of EchemE_{\rm chem} {\it vs.} ΔEG←XΔE_{\rm G\leftarrow X} and the dipole moment depend strongly on adsorption site for each metal, and we use this fact to construct an approximate correction scheme which we go on to test using NO/Pt(100) chemisorption.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.