Paper detail

Device-independent randomness certification using multiple copies of entangled states

We demonstrate to what extent many copies of maximally entangled two-qubit states enable for generating a greater amount of certified randomness than that can be certified from a single copy. Although it appears that greater the dimension of the system implies a higher amount of randomness, the non-triviality lies in the device-independent simultaneous certification of generated randomness from many copies of entangled states. This is because, most of the two-outcome Bell inequalities (viz., Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt, Elegant, or Chain Bell inequality) are optimized for a single copy of two-qubit entangled state. Thus, such Bell inequalities can certify neither many copies of entangled states nor a higher amount of randomness. In this work, we suitably invoke a family of $n$-settings Bell inequalities which is optimized for $\lfloor n/2 \rfloor$ copies of maximally entangled two-qubit states, thereby, possess the ability to certify more randomness from many copies of two-qubit entangled state.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.