Paper detail

Development of (4-epsilon)-dimensional theory for the density of states near the Anderson transition

The density of states for the Schroedinger equation with a Gaussian random potential is determined by the functional integral corresponding to the phi^4 theory with a `wrong' sign of the interaction constant. The special role of the dimension d=4 for such a problem can be seen from different viewpoints but is fundamentally determined by the renormalizability of the theory. The construction of an epsilon-expansion in direct analogy with the phase-transition theory gives rise to the problem of a `spurious' pole. To solve this problem, a proper treatment of the factorial divergency of the perturbation series is necessary. Simplifications arising in high dimensions can be used for the development of a (4-epsilon)-dimensional theory, but this requires successive consideration of four types of theories: a nonrenormalizable theory for d>4, nonrenormalizable and renormalizable theories in the logarithmic situation (d=4), and a super-renormalizable theory for d<4. An approximation is found for each type of theory giving asymptotically exact results. The qualitative effect is the same in all four cases and consists in a shifting of the phase transition point in the complex plane. This results in the elimination of the `spurious' pole and in regularity of the density of states for all energies. A discussion is given of the calculation of high orders of perturbation theory and a perspective of the epsilon-expansion for the problem of conductivity near the Anderson transition.

preprint1999arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.