Paper detail

Developing Non-Stochastic Privacy-Preserving Policies Using Agglomerative Clustering

We consider a non-stochastic privacy-preserving problem in which an adversary aims to infer sensitive information $S$ from publicly accessible data $X$ without using statistics. We consider the problem of generating and releasing a quantization $\hat{X}$ of $X$ to minimize the privacy leakage of $S$ to $\hat{X}$ while maintaining a certain level of utility (or, inversely, the quantization loss). The variables $S$ and $S$ are treated as bounded and non-probabilistic, but are otherwise general. We consider two existing non-stochastic privacy measures, namely the maximum uncertainty reduction $L_0(S \rightarrow \hat{X})$ and the refined information $I_*(S; \hat{X})$ (also called the maximin information) of $S$. For each privacy measure, we propose a corresponding agglomerative clustering algorithm that converges to a locally optimal quantization solution $\hat{X}$ by iteratively merging elements in the alphabet of $X$. To instantiate the solution to this problem, we consider two specific utility measures, the worst-case resolution of $X$ by observing $\hat{X}$ and the maximal distortion of the released data $\hat{X}$. We show that the value of the maximin information $I_*(S; \hat{X})$ can be determined by dividing the confusability graph into connected subgraphs. Hence, $I_*(S; \hat{X})$ can be reduced by merging nodes connecting subgraphs. The relation to the probabilistic information-theoretic privacy is also studied by noting that the G{á}cs-K{ö}rner common information is the stochastic version of $I_*$ and indicates the attainability of statistical indistinguishability.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.