Paper detail

Detonations in Sub-Chandrasekhar Mass C+O White Dwarfs

Explosions of sub-Chandrasekhar-mass white dwarfs are one alternative to the standard Chandrasekhar-mass model of Type Ia supernovae. They are interesting since binary systems with sub-Chandrasekhar-mass primary white dwarfs should be common and this scenario would suggest a simple physical parameter which determines the explosion brightness, namely the mass of the exploding white dwarf. Here we perform one-dimensional hydrodynamical simulations, associated post-processing nucleosynthesis and multi-wavelength radiation transport calculations for pure detonations of carbon-oxygen white dwarfs. The light curves and spectra we obtain from these simulations are in good agreement with observed properties of Type Ia supernovae. In particular, for white dwarf masses from 0.97 - 1.15 Msun we obtain 56Ni masses between 0.3 and 0.8 Msun, sufficient to capture almost the complete range of Type Ia supernova brightnesses. Our optical light curve rise times, peak colours and decline timescales display trends which are generally consistent with observed characteristics although the range of B-band decline timescales displayed by our current set of models is somewhat too narrow. In agreement with observations, the maximum light spectra of the models show clear features associated with intermediate mass elements and reproduce the sense of the observed correlation between explosion luminosity and the ratio of the Si II lines at 6355 and 5972 Angstroms. We therefore suggest that sub-Chandrasekhar mass explosions are a viable model for Type Ia supernovae for any binary evolution scenario leading to explosions in which the optical display is dominated by the material produced in a detonation of the primary white dwarf.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.