Paper detail

Determinization of $ω$-automata unified

We describe a uniform construction for converting $ω$-automata with arbitrary acceptance conditions (based on the notion of infinity sets i.e. the set of states visited infinitely often in a run of the automaton) to equivalent deterministic parity automata (DPW). Given a non-deterministic automaton with $n$ states, our construction gives a DPW with at most $2^{O(n^2 \log n)}$ states and $O(n^2)$ parity indices. The corresponding bounds when the original automaton is deterministic are O(n!) and O(n), respectively. Our algorithm gives better asymptotic bounds on the number of states and parity indices vis-a-vis the best known technique when determinizing Rabin or Streett automata with $Ω{(2^n)}$ acceptance pairs, where $n > 1$. We demonstrate this by describing a family of Streett (and Rabin) automata with $2^{n}$ non-redundant acceptance pairs, for which the best known determinization technique gives a DPW with at least $Ω{(2^{(n^3)})}$ states, while our construction constructs a DRW/DPW with $2^{O(n^2\log n)}$ states. An easy corollary of our construction is that an $ω$-language with Rabin index $k$ cannot be recognized by any $ω$-automaton (deterministic or non-deterministic) with fewer than $O(\sqrt{k})$ states.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.