Paper detail

Deterministic Blind Rendezvous in Cognitive Radio Networks

Blind rendezvous is a fundamental problem in cognitive radio networks. The problem involves a collection of agents (radios) that wish to discover each other in the blind setting where there is no shared infrastructure and they initially have no knowledge of each other. Time is divided into discrete slots; spectrum is divided into discrete channels, $\{1,2,..., n\}$. Each agent may access a single channel in a single time slot and we say that two agents rendezvous when they access the same channel in the same time slot. The model is asymmetric: each agent $A_i$ may only use a particular subset $S_i$ of the channels and different agents may have access to different subsets of channels. The goal is to design deterministic channel hopping schedules for each agent so as to guarantee rendezvous between any pair of agents with overlapping channel sets. Two independent sets of authors, Shin et al. and Lin et al., gave the first constructions guaranteeing asynchronous blind rendezvous in $O(n^2)$ and $O(n^3)$ time, respectively. We present a substantially improved construction guaranteeing that any two agents, $A_i$, $A_j$, will rendezvous in $O(|S_i| |S_j| \log\log n)$ time. Our results are the first that achieve nontrivial dependence on $|S_i|$, the size of the set of available channels. This allows us, for example, to save roughly a quadratic factor over the best previous results in the important case when channel subsets have constant size. We also achieve the best possible bound of $O(1)$ time for the symmetric situation; previous works could do no better than $O(n)$. Using the probabilistic method and Ramsey theory we provide evidence in support of our suspicion that our construction is asymptotically optimal for small size channel subsets: we show both a $c |S_i||S_j|$ lower bound and a $c \log\log n$ lower bound when $|S_i|, |S_j| \leq n/2$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.