Paper detail

Determining the Number of Non-Spurious Arcs in a Learned DAG Model: Investigation of a Bayesian and a Frequentist Approach

In many application domains, such as computational biology, the goal of graphical model structure learning is to uncover discrete relationships between entities. For example, in our problem of interest concerning HIV vaccine design, we want to infer which HIV peptides interact with which immune system molecules (HLA molecules). For problems of this nature, we are interested in determining the number of nonspurious arcs in a learned graphical model. We describe both a Bayesian and frequentist approach to this problem. In the Bayesian approach, we use the posterior distribution over model structures to compute the expected number of true arcs in a learned model. In the frequentist approach, we develop a method based on the concept of the False Discovery Rate. On synthetic data sets generated from models similar to the ones learned, we find that both the Bayesian and frequentist approaches yield accurate estimates of the number of non-spurious arcs. In addition, we speculate that the frequentist approach, which is non-parametric, may outperform the parametric Bayesian approach in situations where the models learned are less representative of the data. Finally, we apply the frequentist approach to our problem of HIV vaccine design.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.