Paper detail

Determining the aberrations in a nearly diffraction-limited spectrograph

We present a method to determine the static aberrations in a nearly diffraction-limited spectrograph introduced, for example, by alignment or manufacturing errors. We consider an instrument with two stages separated by a slit or image slicer located in the intermediate focal plane. In such a spectrograph, it is not trivial to distinguish aberrations in the first stage, before the slit, from those in the second, after the slit. However, our method achieves this. Measuring these aberrations separately opens the possibility of reducing them, by realignment or other means, and thereby improving the optical performance of the instrument. The method is based on fitting models to multiple images of a point source, with controlled displacements of the source perpendicular to the slit and controlled defocuses of the second stage or the detector. Fitting models to these images allows the determination of the aberrations in both stages. Our key discovery is that the displaced and defocused images provide additional information which allows us to break the ambiguity between the two stages. We present simulations that validate the performance of the method.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.