Paper detail

Determining star formation rates of active galactic nuclei host galaxies based on SED fitting with sub-mm data

We present the star formation rate (SFR) measurements based on the spectral energy distribution (SED) analysis with new sub-mm fluxes combined with archival multi-wavelength data for a sample of 52 AGN host galaxies at z $<0.2$. We carried out sub-mm observations using the SCUBA-2 camera at the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope, and obtained flux or an upper limit at 450 and 850 $μ$m for each target. By experimenting the effect of the AGN dust component in the SED fit, we find that dust luminosity can be overestimated if AGN contribution is ignored. While the SFR based on 4000Å break shows a significant offset compared to dust luminosity based SFR, the SFR obtained by the artificial neural network (Ellison et al. 2016) generally shows consistency albeit with a large scatter. We find that SFR correlates with AGN outflow strength manifested by the [OIII] $λ5007$ emission line, and that AGNs with higher Eddington ratios and stronger outflows are in general hosted by galaxies with higher SFR, which is consistent with the correlation reported by Woo et al. (2020). This suggests no instantaneous quenching of star formation due to AGN feedback.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access12 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.