Paper detail

Determining Neutrino and Supernova Parameters with a Galactic Supernova

We investigate the sensitivity of some of the proposed next-generation neutrino experiments to a galactic supernova. In particular, we study how well the supernova parameters (the average energies and luminosities) can be separated from the unknown neutrino oscillation parameters ($θ_{13}$ and the neutrino mass hierarchy). Three types of experiments, all in the 100-kton class, are compared. These are: a 540 kton water-Cherenkov detector, a 100 kton liquid Argon detector and a 50 kton scintillator detector. We demonstrate that practically all of these proposed detectors have the possibility to determine the hierarchy of the neutrino masses if the angle $θ_{13}$ is sufficiently large ($\sin^2(θ_{13}) > 10^{-4}$) and the hierarchy of the average energies is larger than about 20%. They can at the same time determine some of the supernova parameters well. The average energy of the $ν_μ$ and $ν_τ$ species can be determined within 5% uncertainty in most of the parameter space suggested by supernova simulations. The detection of several separable channels measuring different combinations of charged current and neutral current processes is crucial for determining the value of $θ_{13}$ and the hierarchy. However, there are cases where a few of the SN parameters can be determined rather well even if only the main charged current detection channel is available.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.