Paper detail

Determining layer number of two dimensional flakes of transition-metal dichalcogenides by the Raman intensity from substrate

Transition-metal dichalcogenide (TMD) semiconductors have been widely studied due to their distinctive electronic and optical properties. The property of TMD flakes is a function of its thickness, or layer number (N). How to determine N of ultrathin TMDs materials is of primary importance for fundamental study and practical applications. Raman mode intensity from substrates has been used to identify N of intrinsic and defective multilayer graphenes up to N=100. However, such analysis is not applicable for ultrathin TMD flakes due to the lack of a unified complex refractive index ($\tilde{n}$) from monolayer to bulk TMDs. Here, we discuss the N identification of TMD flakes on the SiO$_2$/Si substrate by the intensity ratio between the Si peak from 100-nm (or 89-nm) SiO$_2$/Si substrates underneath TMD flakes and that from bare SiO$_2$/Si substrates. We assume the real part of $\tilde{n}$ of TMD flakes as that of monolayer TMD and treat the imaginary part of $\tilde{n}$ as a fitting parameter to fit the experimental intensity ratio. An empirical $\tilde{n}$, namely, $\tilde{n}_{eff}$, of ultrathin MoS$_{2}$, WS$_{2}$ and WSe$_{2}$ flakes from monolayer to multilayer is obtained for typical laser excitations (2.54 eV, 2.34 eV, or 2.09 eV). The fitted $\tilde{n}_{eff}$ of MoS$_{2}$ has been used to identify N of MoS$_{2}$ flakes deposited on 302-nm SiO$_2$/Si substrate, which agrees well with that determined from their shear and layer-breathing modes. This technique by measuring Raman intensity from the substrate can be extended to identify N of ultrathin 2D flakes with N-dependent $\tilde{n}$ . For the application purpose, the intensity ratio excited by specific laser excitations has been provided for MoS$_{2}$, WS$_{2}$ and WSe$_{2}$ flakes and multilayer graphene flakes deposited on Si substrates covered by 80-110 nm or 280-310 nm SiO$_2$ layer.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.