Paper detail

Determining anomalies in a semilinear elliptic equation by a minimal number of measurements

We are concerned with the inverse boundary problem of determining anomalies associated with a semilinear elliptic equation of the form $-Δu+a(\mathbf x, u)=0$, where $a(\mathbf x, u)$ is a general nonlinear term that belongs to a Hölder class. It is assumed that the inhomogeneity of $f(\mathbf x, u)$ is contained in a bounded domain $D$ in the sense that outside $D$, $a(\mathbf x, u)=λu$ with $λ\in\mathbb{C}$. We establish novel unique identifiability results in several general scenarios of practical interest. These include determining the support of the inclusion (i.e. $D$) independent of its content (i.e. $a(\mathbf{x}, u)$ in $D$) by a single boundary measurement; and determining both $D$ and $a(\mathbf{x}, u)|_D$ by $M$ boundary measurements, where $M\in\mathbb{N}$ signifies the number of unknown coefficients in $a(\mathbf x, u)$. The mathematical argument is based on microlocally characterising the singularities in the solution $u$ induced by the geometric singularities of $D$, and does not rely on any linearisation technique.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.