Paper detail

Determination of the Primordial Magnetic Field Power Spectrum by Faraday Rotation Correlations

(Abridged) This paper introduces the formalism which connects between rotation measure ($\RM$) measurements for extragalactic sources and the cosmological magnetic field power spectrum. It is shown that the amplitude and shape of the cosmological magnetic field power spectrum can be constrained by using a few hundred radio sources, for which Faraday $\RM$s are available. This constraint is of the form $B_{rms} \simless 1 \times [2.6\times10^{-7} cm^{-3}/ \bar n_b] h $ nano-Gauss (nG) on $\sim 10-50 \hmpc$ scales. The constraint is superior to and supersedes any other constraint which come from either CMB fluctuations, Baryonic nucleosyn thesis, or the first two multipoles of the magnetic field expansion. Demonstration of the ability to detect such magnetic fields, using Bayesian statistics, is carried out by constructing simulations of the field and mimicking observations. This procedure also provides error estimates for the derived quantities. The two main noise contributions due to the Galactic RM and the internal RM are treated in a statistical way. For power indices -1\leq n \leq 1 in a flat cosmology (Omega_m=1) we estimate the signal-to-noise ratio, Q, for limits on the magnetic field B_{rms} on ~50 h^{-1}Mpc scale. Employing one patch of a few square degrees on the sky with source number density n_{src}, an approximate estimate yields Q\simeq 3 \times (B_{rms}/1 {nG})(n_{src}/50 {deg}^{-2}) (2.6\times10^{-7} {cm}^{-3}/ \bar n_b) h $. An all sky coverage, with much sparser, but carefully tailored sample of ~500 sources, yields Q \simeq 1 with the same scaling. An ideal combination of small densely sampled patches and sparse all-sky coverage yields Q\simeq 3 with better constraints for the power index. All of these estimates are corroborated by the simulations.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.